The CE marking has to be affixed on a construction product on the basis of the harmonised standard EN 1090-1:2009+A1:2011 when all the following conditions are satisfied:
Note 1:Wind turbines and their towers cannot be CE marked under EN 1090-1. They are subject to the Machinery Directive (MD) and the complete wind turbine system must be CE marked thereunder. One of the essential requirements of the MD is the stability of the machine. Thus, the obligatory CE marking under the MD also covers the stability of the wind turbine. The application of the CPR, in addition to the MD, would not cover additional performance aspects. Furthermore, wind turbine towers are not considered to be construction products under the CPR. Nevertheless, wind turbine towers can be assessed by EN 1090-1 (or others) in order to fulfil the stability requirements under the MD.
Note 2:'Common' fences and railings (balustrades) which merely have the function of preventing a person from falling are not structural products because they do not support (a part of) the structure. In general their failure will affect the satisfaction of Basic Work Requirement 4 – Safety and accessibility in use (as detailed in Annex I of Regulation EU 305/2011) rather than Basic Work Requirement 1 (mechanical resistance and stability). For this reason, these common balustrades cannot be CE marked on the basis of standard EN 1090-1. However, balustrades which do have a role in supporting the structure of the construction work or parts of it have a structural function, i.e. their performance may affect the mechanical resistance and stability of e.g. a building AND they prevent a person from falling, thus are covered by EN 1090-1 and must therefore be placed on the EU market with a DoP and the CE marking.
Note 3: Elaborations under Note 2 also apply to staircases.
On the Confindustria site of bergamo https://www.confindustriabergamo.it this distinction is simplified as follows:
To understand pragmatically whether a carpentry product is subject to CE marking according to EN1090, it is to be considered whether removing from the work this component is concerned with the strength and stability of the whole work or one of its parts, privileging in this analysis, the stability of the work with respect to the security of people (covered by other regulations). For a correct interpretation of the doubts, see the FAQs published by the European Commission and the clarification document published by the Ministry. For a correct interpretation of the doubts, see the FAQs published by the European Commission and the clarification document published by the Ministry.
Other possible cases where CE marking for Structural Carpentry Products is foreseen:
N.B. In Italy carpentry products incorporated in the structure of the work, but not considered as construction products (according to EU Regulation 305/2011 and for which the CE marking according to EN 1090 is not applicable) may be subject to the Technical Standards on Buildings (as in parapet rails) and therefore must be calculated by a professional, and we would add as a note: produced by a DM transformation center 14/01/2008
As it is known from July 1, 2014, the implementation of the "CE" marking of steel and aluminum structural elements used in buildings (UNI EN 1090-1: 2011) has become mandatory.
The standard provides a unique approach to the realization of any type of structure, whether it be large civil engineering works such as the construction of stadiums, hospitals, major infrastructure of strategic importance, such as bridges on national and international routes (eg bridge over Bosporus or the new containment system of Chernobyl), to the simple metal constructions for the construction of canopies, stairs, or simple components for the static consolidation of buildings, the standard applies to serial production and not, to differentiate the technical requirements according to the complexity of the components, four execution classes, with more stringent technical requirements, have been introduced from class 1 for the so-called simple works with moderate risks related to possible collages or failures to class 4, which refers to particularly complex structures with important safety implications!
he execution class of a steel (or aluminum) structure can easily be determined by combining the essential parameters divided by the Concentration Class (CC or Consequence Class) and POTENTIAL RISKS (SC or Service Categories and PCs or Production Categories)
Consequences Class | Descriptions | Examples of buildings and civil engineering works |
CC3 | High consequences for loss of lives, or very serious consequences in economic, social or environmental terms |
|
CC2 | Average consequences for loss of human life, considerable consequences in economic, social or environmental terms |
|
CC1 | Low Impact on Human Losses, with Moderate or Negligible Economic, Social or Environmental Repercussions |
|
CC1=LOW CC2=STANDARD CC3=HIGH |
Categoria | Parametri |
SC1 |
|
SC2 |
|
DCL,DCM, DCH: Ductility classes according to EN 1998-1 (eurocode-8) SC1= static load SC2=fatigue stress |
The maps with seismic indices can be downloaded from the site of the Civil Protection at: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/classificazione.wp,
Alternatively, you can download the updated map from the following link: mappa.pdf, It is important to note that regions such as the Marche, Abruzzo, Umbria and the provinces such as Rimini, Arezzo, Forlì-Cesena, are almost entirely classified as seismic zone 2 (MEDIUM HIGH RISK).
On the site at Arcelor Mittal http://www.constructalia.com/ a useful dispensation is available on the design methodologies in the seismic zone and on the choice of ductility classes DCL, DCM, DCH anti-microbial structures in accio.pdf, briefly, the Technical Building Regulations, for dissipative structures only allowed two classes of ductility:
Now the Eurocodes, in particular the Eurocode 8 UNI EN 1998-1, provide that any of the ductility classes, but with particular geographical constraints that must be defined by the states concerned, should be used, in the national appendix recently published in the Official Gazette and freely prepaid from the official site http://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/, it is possible to use the DCL duct class in any seismic zone including high seismicity at the condition of designing the structure as non-dissipative with the limitations of the case!
Also on this topic was expressed also the CTS (Technical Committee of Scentifico) of the Emilia Romagna region http://www.ambiente.regione.emilia-romagna.it the opinion is freely available at the address parere in merito alla progettazione di strutture poco dissipative.pdf
Although the choice of the ductility class to be adopted and the designer's exclusive prerogative, as can be understood from various publications, the DCL class should be used predominantly, if not exclusively in low seismic areas (due to forces in play) while in other areas could be more correct or at least sensible even in the light of recent seismic events in Emilia Romagna (see Finale Emilia, zone considered as medium-low zone 3) to build into DCM and DCH ductile classes
Category | Parameters |
PC1 |
|
PC2 |
|
PC1<S355(=S275) PC2=S355 |
Conseguence Classes | CC1 | CC2 | CC3 | ||||
Service Categories | SC1 | SC2 | SC1 | SC2 | SC1 | SC2 | |
Production Categories | PC1 | EXC1 | EXC2 | EXC2 | EXC3 | EXC3* | EXC3* |
PC2 | EXC2 | EXC2 | EXC2 | EXC3 | EXC3* | EXC4 | |
* EXC4 should be applied to special structures or structures with extreme consequences of a structureal failure as required by national provision |
Now, as an example of the destination, the province of Rimini, Perugia or Pesaro is quite obvious that, unless there are plans or realization of greenhouses for the cultivation of vegetables or simple warehouses for non-hazardous materials and where the presence of human staff is to be regarded as completely occasional and absolutely limited over time, the correct execution class to use is only EXC3 even with S275 or S235 quality materials regardless of thickness. So if you exclude regions such as Sardinia and part of Northern Italy it is absolutely essential to design and trust EXC3 certified class companies!
Since 1 July the European harmonized standard EN 1090-1 "Execution of steel and aluminum structures - Part 1: Requirements for the conformity assessment of structural components" has entered into force, therefore the CE marking for the marketing of such products.
How to publish on the site of the Superior Council of Public Works, through a freely consulted and downloadable address UNI 1090-1 D.M. 14/01/2008.pdf , it should be noted in particular that, since the end of the coexistence period of the harmonized European standard EN 1090-1, its CE marking will be the only way of qualifying products falling within the scope of the harmonized standard for the purposes of the use of the products themselves in works. From that date, for those metallic carpentry products covered by EN 1090-1, the Central Technical Service will no longer issue the attestation of a declaration of the activity of a metalworking carpentry center.
For the serial products covered by the European harmonized standard EN 1090-1, the aforementioned CE marking constitutes a sufficient qualification of the product in accordance with § 11.1, case A), DM 14.01.2008. Therefore, the manufacturer of structural steel carpentry items, if they have CE marking for these products on the basis of EN 1090-1, does not require the certificate of filing of the documentation as a metal-processing transformation center issued pursuant to §§ 11.3.4.10 and 11.3.1.7 of DM 14.01.2008.
This certificate will be issued only in the case of metal products not covered by EN 1090-1 in the residual case, resulting in such products being mandatory for use in works.
Additional information is available on the network, below are some sources: